The single biggest mistake I see landlords make — including experienced ones — is pricing a property against what they'd like it to achieve, rather than what the street will actually pay.
Start with real comparables
Not the highest-priced listing in the area — the ones that actually let. A property still advertised after six weeks tells you more about the market than one that let in four days at a lower figure. I look at what's genuinely gone under offer in the last 30-60 days on the same street or the equivalent road nearby, not the aspirational asking prices sitting stale on the portals.
Overpricing has a real cost
A property that sits empty for an extra three weeks while overpriced almost never earns that difference back. The maths rarely works in the landlord's favour — void periods cost more than most people estimate once you account for continued mortgage payments, council tax, and utilities on an empty property.
What actually moves the number
- Condition and presentation — a well-photographed, well-maintained flat can command a genuine premium over an identical but tired one.
- Speed to market — the first two weeks of a listing get the most attention; pricing right from day one matters more than adjusting later.
- Furnished vs unfurnished — this shifts the tenant pool as much as the price, particularly for corporate lets.
- Transport and amenity changes — a new development, a changed bus route, or a school catchment shift can move rents faster than owners expect.
A second opinion is worth having
Even landlords who've let the same property for years benefit from a fresh market read periodically — rents in Prime London postcodes can move meaningfully year to year, and the last agent's figure isn't always still the right one.
I give every property a market-accurate figure based on real comparables — not an inflated number to win the instruction.
Make an Enquiry